Ethnicity and Group Rights :: Sociology Race Gender Essays

Ethnicity and Group RightsABSTRACT juvenile developments in biology birth made it possible to acquire to a greater extent(prenominal) and more precise information concerning our genetic makeup. There be intravenous feeding meetings of people who may want to know about our genes. First, we ourselves can occupy an touch on in being aware of own health status. Second, on that point are people who are genetically linked with us, and who can abide an interest in the knowledge. Third, individuals with whom we have contr proceedings and economic arrangements may have an interest in knowing about our genetic makeup. Fourth, society as a whole can have an interest in the composition of our genes. As regards the question of motivation, the term should can be interpreted in deuce-ace ways. Prudentially speaking, to study that individuals should act in a certain manner is to say that the actions in question promote the long-term self-interest of these individuals. From the viewpoint of morality, we should do what is right and avoid doing what is wrong. When it comes to legal thinking, it is held in most liberal societies that sober other-regarding harm should be the primary justification for the use of coercion and constraint. In the paper, all these aspects are examined in more detail. In multicultural westbound societies more and more frequently members of ethnic minority groups behave and act in ways which the majority find different, strange or alien, sometimes purge irrational, threatening or immoral. Differences in action and behaviour range, for instance, from clothing and fashion accessories to the notification of religious holidays and the mutilation of the human body.The question that I propose to address in this paper is How should the majority respond to these differences? Should the reaction be tolerant and permissive? Or should it be cautious and restrictive? Should the majority hold that individuals are entitled to act as they wish unless the ir actions inflict harm on other people? Or should they think that ethnic groups as collectives have rights which ought not to be violated by constraints on the behaviour of their members?The questions concerning the group rights of minorities have recently been discussed in considerable detail in the frameworks of communitarianism and deontological liberalism. However, the obstruction with these approaches is that they presuppose complicated and sometimes metaphysically and ideologically loaded accounts of liberty, individual(prenominal) identity and interpersonal relationships. I have therefore opted for a simpler and more accessible starting point.