Tuesday, January 29, 2019
Contention about gay marriage Essay
Everyone has the right to take out married, right, they should not be judged on who they are and what they believe. Everyone is equal and has equal rights I doesnt matter what type of sex they are.Same-sex couples want to marry for all(a) the same reasons as their opposite-sex counterparts. These reasons include for legal security, to publicly celebrate their commitment, to exit greater legal protection for their children, or simply because they are in love. According to a national study by researchers at the University of Queensland, 54% of Australian same-sex partners would marry if they had the choice. 80% of Australians in same-sex affinitys support sexual union par even if they do not wish to marry. First, we will look at the benefits that flow to same-sex couples who marry. This is followed by the wider social benefits that come from removing discrimination from the Marriage bear and ensuring equality for same-sex couples.Marriage has evolved throughout history, so it can change again. diametric cultures have treated marriage differently. Some promoted arranged marriages. Others tied marriage to dowries. Still another(prenominal)s saw marriage as a political relationship through which they could forge family alliances.But all these variations still embraced the fundamental, unchanging amount of money of marriage. They still saw it, in general, as a public, lifelong league between one man and one woman for the sake of generating and nurture children. This understanding predates any government or religion. Its a pre-political, pre-religious trigger evident even in cultures that had no law or religious belief to promote it. Yet, even supposing the essence of marriage could change, would that mean it should? We know from other areas of life such(prenominal) as medical research and nuclear physical science that just because you can do something doesnt mean you ought. After all, such action may not be ethical or take to heart the common good. Eve n if this argument had historical basis, it would not necessarily be a good reason to change the meaning of marriage.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment