Collaborating to Expand the Pipeline Essay

            favorable action is a policy that is aimed at providing positive measures to remedy effects of past discrimination against members of certain groups (Clayton & angstrom Crosby 1992, p.2). One of the atomic number 18as that suffer underrepresentation of the diverse, underrepresented individuals and minority group in colleges is the laws schools and subsequently in the legal profession. The questioned posed is Is affirmatory action the best solution to completelyeviating this crisis or is it the major cause together with separate practices that have contributed to these underrepresentation?             First of all is the admission unconscious process. Admission excerpt considers those with a bachelors pointedness for an accredited university or college. Few underrepresented minority students ar able to ensure college and obtain the relevant qualifications. Moreover, there are disparities in fall of applicants a nd the number who get enrolled. For example in 2000, 74500 individuals submitted their application to ABA- approved school and an imagine of 67% of the total were admitted (ABA/ LSAC Pre- multitude Report, 2005, p, 4). This illustrates a flaw in the acceptance procedure that focus on higher deservingness in which its rise up enter tr stop over that underrepresented minorities score less(prenominal) on the Law Schools Admission seek (LSAT).            Secondly the individual state bar exams are a dire impediment. While the LSAT remains a reliable predictor of success in law school and the Law School Admission Council ( repairrs of the LSAT), warn against over-reliance on numerical qualifiers alone (ABA/ LSAC Pre-Conference Report, 2005, p, 5). Raised cut off points detriment the minorities who are disproportionately at the bottom in addition the bars are also misapplied. The percentage of residents in a state should have a proportionate percentage at the law school. The lack of a topic bar does also contribute to this issue.              The above two examples illustrate wherefore affirmative action is needed in leveling admissions. Higher merit and higher cut off points are serving to lock step up minority groups from accessing law information. In coming up with a criteria for selection, the selection board should put into consideration performance of minority groups which is at the bring low end of the spectrum.            terry cloth Eastland suggests that affirmative action promotes discrimination. He argues that there is nothing like positive or nix discrimination. In Higher education for example, when the institution nonpluss a lower grade for color students, the act in itself creates discrimination. These groups of students who will be enrolled under affirmative action are well sensible that they are in that position due to their race. It is a negative experience t hat is not easy to erase. Sometimes attitudes from the majority students will usurp the students from the minority. The majority students may not look at the minority as equals.            Affirmative action leads to stigma. Eastland says that very few plenty are aware of the abilities and potential of the marginalized groups. In this case they are likely to be less respected and less valued. This can end up psychologically bear upon these groups and it can be worsened if they fail to perform. Terry end believes that an purlieu should an equal on the job(p) basis. If students have to be enrolled for higher education, it should be ground on merit and not race. This will create an equal working environment of mutual relationship.           Furthermore, Eastland equates Affirmative action to lower standards. The rationale of having a policy that sets asides positions after a normal criterion creates a rampart between quality and le ss quality. By having this policy, institutions are accepting that results post from minority groups are of lesser quality and lesser magnitude to that from the majority. constitution makers argue that the minority are affected by certain factors that make them not to equal results of the majority. It then beats logic that it would be easier firmness factors that make minority perform lesser than providing a criterion that guaranty certain results.           Terry Eastland comments and views in regard to affirmative action die hard to disapprove use of affirmative action against underrepresentation based on color. His views do not factor underrepresentation due to sexual activity. However the logic behind his reasons and those of other scholars can equally be equated to affirmative action on gender and sex segregation           Gender affirmative actions have shown to improve the emplacement of women in the society. In fact advoc ates for gender affirmative actions have sprung from variant women activists and organizations. Women have gained access to representations in legislative organs, various courses in colleges that stereotypically were set for men. However it is urged that continuous paying attention to a group of people will result in then differences becoming more striking than the commonalities among people (Clayton & Crosby 1992, p.11). This statement thus emphasizes Terry Eastlands arguments against affirmative action.          To conclude, the benefits of affirmative action are actually visible. Moving forward however, the primal principles of affirmative action seem to have been overtaken with time. Putting into consideration Terry Eastland arguments in regard to affirmative action, the negatives of affirmative action outweigh the positives. Affirmative action has led to lower productivity, increased segregation and stigmatization. The call to end affirmative actions t hus is justified.ReferencesClayton, Susan D, and Faye J. Crosby. Justice, Gender, and Affirmative Action. Ann Arbor, Mich Univ. of Michigan Press, 1992. Print.Law Schools Admission Council. Pre Conference Report (2005) Collaborating to Expand the Pipeline. Retrieved from http//www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/op/pipelineconf/PipelinePostReport.authcheckdam.pdfSource document