Conflicting Perspectives Essay

As Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius once suggested Everything we find out is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth embodying the public opinion that self-contradictory perspectives ar held by different people towards both events and individuals. I believe that this common idea is held true in William Shakespeares payoff Julius Caesar, discussing the conflict between Brutus, Cassius and Antony, Richard Glovers Sydney Morning Herald article harbour a import to Mourn the Mainstream, debating against the depreciation of the respect over receiving set send between generations, and abrupt genus Capras classic hire Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, which containes the triumph of American ideals through the conflicting morals of Senator Jefferson Smith and Joseph Paine. In each we see how the respective composers have utilise main protagonists as well as various literary and cinematic devices to express the theme of conflicting perspectives and infl uence the audiences reception.During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeares pattern of Antony incorporates that of a modify, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar embodied in his ban When Caesar says, Do this, it is performed. Antonys obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve Caesar, (his) lord. In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus inner confusion to the vox populipoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy that encouraging the traitorous desires he doth bestride the narrow world homogeneous a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs. here(predicate) Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesars authorization as a leader, such(prenominal) a feeble temper should so ge t the start of the majestic world.Following the assassination of Caesar, differing perspectives arise when these dickens protagonists present speeches to the plebeians of Rome in Act 3 Scene 2. Brutus natural, humble tone both calms and directs the crowd tobelieve Caesars death was for The trusty of Rome Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than Caesar were dead, to live all freemen? With the phthisis of a rhetorical question and repetition in his words, such as valiant, honour and Caesar the ambitious, Brutus is able to influence and manipulate the plebeians to what he considers the correct viewpoint let Brutus be Caesar In sheer contrast, Antony uses sarcastic, derogative terms against Brutus to allow the crowd to truly question Brutus honour and nobility. Caesar was my friend, sheepfold and just to me, but Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus was an august man. Antonys repetition of Brutus was an honourable man forms into sarcasm, thus influencing the c rowd to disregard Brutus morality and entrust that Cassius deems the frank perspective of Caesar.Relatedly, Richard Glovers article written November 2nd, 2013 Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream demonstrates the differing perspectives of audiences appreciating radio broadcasting over time. As stated by Glover, who himself is the protagonist as he is a radio presenter, listeners would tolerate willingly any radio station aired at the time Adults would drop dead a program designed for 12-year-olds. Now, as a result of the ripening social media There is a need to instantly inform the spreader of their song decision. Glovers repetition of outrage and annoyance, provides us with a strong observation of his view on the matter and what he sees to be the correct opinion, whilst coherently outlining the immense change in perspective of a common audiences viewpoint on radio stations over the years resulting from social media, which is comparable to Antonys speech.The protagonist Brutus a nd his standoff with honour stands a key notion in Shakespeares Julius Caesar. afterwards the assassination of Caesar, conflicting perspectives arise when Brutus suspects that Cassius has been dishonourable by taking bribes, Cassius, you yourself/ are much condemned to have an itchiness palm. In response Cassius retorts I an itching palm?, with an exclamatory tone, provoking a fight. Through the use of emotive language and sickness imagery, such as corruption, bleed, and contaminate, Brutus spells out his contempt towards such poor principles and his all-powerful closing lines I had rather be a dog and bay the moon/ thansuch a Roman cement this stance on the matter, whilst stating that he considers that his view on honour is the truthful viewpoint.Comparably, the related text of Frank Capras 1939 film Mr. Smith Goes to Washington effectively represents the conflicting set of corruption and honour. Capras protagonist the amateur senator Jefferson Smith rises to express his know ledge that the scheme of a Deficiency Bill for a butch is fraudulent and that various corrupt congressmen are attempting to use it for their own service A man who controls a political machine, a Mr. James Taylor, was powerful enough to buy men and put them in this congress to transcend his graft Through the use of an honest, pleading tone and low bung shots, Capra successfully provides Smith with a dominant and commanding image, trance and entertaining his audience whilst showing that his perspective was truly the correct one. Evidently, Senator Joseph Paine attempts to close out Smith from exposing the truth and abolishing his reputation numerous times. Capra has manipulated the light to project his glasses a white gleam, providing the antagonist with a spiteful frontage. Paine at last embraces an accusative tone and boldly declares that Senator Smith has told lie upon lie and now, he is trying to blackmail this Senate as he tried to blackmail me originally he ultimately s torms off in rage.In Shakespeares Julius Caesar, Frank Capras Mr. Smith Goes to Washington and Richard Glovers Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream, each composer has uniquely represented the theme of conflicting perspectives by drawing upon devices specific to their textual form. These texts also hold the take statement true, as protagonists do believe their own viewpoint is correct.